We found, as expected, that estimates of species pools were most variable where the total number of samples and species detected were low. The use of available yet disparate national‐level and local‐level plot data, using different measurement and sampling protocols, would therefore need to assume that species are part of the same regional species pool. One advantage of PERMANOVA is that the method is unaffected by correlation among variables (Anderson 2001, Anderson and Walsh 2013), which may occur when species have a tendency to co‐occur. When utilizing the Chao estimator, for example, we found that confidence intervals constructed from species richness estimates and their standard errors indicate that there were significant differences between urban and PF only in Winchester, Charlotte, and Roanoke, Virginia, USA. 2016) or to understand the resilience of different forests to climate change and anthropogenic stressors. Learn about our remote access options, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, PO Box 870344, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35406 USA, Biology Program, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Universidad del Rosario, Kr 26 No 63B‐48, Bogotá, Colombia, Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech, 310 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, Virginia, 24061 USA. First, our analyses were limited to data collected with two standardized methods. Main Difference – Genetic Diversity vs Species Diversity. Tree sampling is most commonly accomplished via plot‐based sampling protocols, and thus, we focus our review on methods applicable to this type of sampling. 2016) and are particularly important given increasing interest in biotic homogenization of urban ecosystems (McKinney 2006, Yang et al. In this case we are using the Shannon Index which is: … Finally, using these methods and the urban and peri‐urban data, we analyzed how different assumptions and selected methods can influence results in answering common research questions in urban ecology. Our study, which further incorporated disparate data sources, demonstrates that the Raup‐Crick dissimilarity indices, based on presence/absence data, are robust to sampling differences. (2016) and Nock et al. However, these comparisons are of great importance, as they allow researchers and managers to not only identify research questions, but develop metrics to assess management and planning activities across different tree populations. and you may need to create a new Wiley Online Library account. H�b```f``�c`e`��`�e@ ^���9��2���;����To2 �Q�h��������� �TR6K� iy š`Qnq�����6�G~0x,`�i`�c�����&�`S���"GM�ONN� �U���QZi�z� L�!� endstream endobj 50 0 obj 160 endobj 18 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 14 0 R /Resources 19 0 R /Contents [ 26 0 R 28 0 R 30 0 R 32 0 R 34 0 R 36 0 R 45 0 R 47 0 R ] /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /CropBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Rotate 0 >> endobj 19 0 obj << /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text ] /Font << /F2 38 0 R /TT2 21 0 R /TT4 23 0 R /TT6 40 0 R /TT8 43 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 48 0 R >> /ColorSpace << /Cs5 24 0 R >> >> endobj 20 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 905 /CapHeight 0 /Descent -211 /Flags 32 /FontBBox [ -628 -376 2034 1048 ] /FontName /Arial,Bold /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 133 >> endobj 21 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 146 /Widths [ 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 333 0 0 278 333 278 278 556 556 556 556 556 556 0 0 0 0 278 278 0 584 0 0 0 667 0 722 722 0 611 778 722 278 0 0 556 833 722 0 0 0 722 667 611 722 667 944 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 556 556 500 556 556 278 556 556 222 222 500 222 833 556 556 556 0 333 500 278 556 500 722 500 500 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /Arial /FontDescriptor 22 0 R >> endobj 22 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 905 /CapHeight 0 /Descent -211 /Flags 32 /FontBBox [ -665 -325 2028 1037 ] /FontName /Arial /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 0 >> endobj 23 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 121 /Widths [ 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 0 0 0 0 0 0 722 722 722 722 667 0 0 0 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 667 0 722 667 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 556 611 556 611 556 333 611 611 278 0 0 278 889 611 611 611 0 389 556 333 611 556 0 0 556 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /Arial,Bold /FontDescriptor 20 0 R >> endobj 24 0 obj [ /CalRGB << /WhitePoint [ 0.9505 1 1.089 ] /Gamma [ 2.22221 2.22221 2.22221 ] /Matrix [ 0.4124 0.2126 0.0193 0.3576 0.71519 0.1192 0.1805 0.0722 0.9505 ] >> ] endobj 25 0 obj 524 endobj 26 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 25 0 R >> stream 2015, Jenerette et al. Second, we then compare forested peri‐urban areas to urban areas, including plots with zero sampled trees in our species abundance matrices. 0000005702 00000 n While observed and estimated species richness values were very close between the two types of datasets when applying each of the estimators, there were larger, detectable differences in the standard error of these bootstrap estimates. 2017). While the Roanoke and Abingdon UFs were similar to all UFs and PFs in Virginia, the Falls Church UF was only dissimilar to the Virginia PFs. Species Richness =Variety of species or the number of different species (or genera, families, etc.). This has often been referred to as an assumption of equal “multivariate spread” among groups, which is a multivariate analog to the assumption of homoscedasticity in univariate ANOVA. 2018), and a variety of qualitative methods, as well as specifically designed protocols which have included data on herbaceous vegetation and soils (Groffman et al. So, to compare the magnitudes of two diversities, calculate the effective numbers of species (the exponential of the Shannon entropy, for example) of the two communities so that you can compare them on a linear scale and get an intuitive feel for the difference. But, for most of the sites sampled, urban forests and their peri‐urban counterparts are fairly close, indicating low values of dissimilarity, and therefore indicating a lack of urban homogenization. A uniform population of a single species of plants adapted to a particular environment is more at … 2011). Genetic Diversity. That is, with larger trees having more weight in the analyses, the PF vs. UF tree diversity differences were more consistent by ecological province, as evidenced by the larger P‐value of the interaction. If the hypothesis of ecological homogenization was supported, we would expect a different outcome for urban forests; species composition across urban communities would not be significantly different by province. (2006) reviewed the performance of 15 estimators in terms of their insensitivity to sample heterogeneity among studies. The choice of pool estimator is also important, and using the recommended bootstrap method with these kinds of sample types results in more conservative estimates of species richness, except where sampling intensity was high (e.g., Atlanta; Blood et al. However, species richness increases with sample size. 2011). Study locations from the SUTIC database were part of a collaborative project sponsored by several universities and the Southern Research Station of the USDA Forest Service and provided data collected from eight cities in the southeastern United States between 2008 and 2014 (Fig. We used the R function specpool to estimate the total species pool as well as the total pool of genera. If a tree had multiple stems below dbh, it was counted as a single tree, and the largest diameters (up to six) were recorded. Components of species diversity: species richness and relative abundance. While there is a variant of the Raup‐Crick index available in the R function vegdist, this is not appropriate for comparing FIA and i‐Tree Eco data, as it assumes equal sampling probabilities for species. 2018). 2003). Likewise, when using the Jackknife or Bootstrap estimator, many more pairs of locations were found to have non‐overlapping confidence intervals in terms of species and genus richness. 0000009495 00000 n SPECIES DIVERSITY MEASURES (Version 5, 23 January 2014) ... To describe and compare different communities, ecologists broke the idea of diversity down into three components – Chapter 13 Page 534. alpha, beta, and gamma diversity. Species composition is a multivariate characteristic of a population that can be used to compare community structures. Plot‐based data, where plots are considered as the independent unit of observation, require mixed modeling methods to account for the potential for correlation among trees measured within the same plot (García 2006). Studies across the globe are beginning to use available, but disparate datasets to better understand urban ecosystem dynamics and to make analyses and inferences regarding regional‐ to continental‐scale woody vegetation diversity, composition, and ecosystem functionality (Kendal et al. If we have two sites with equal species richness, yet one site is dominated by a single species whereas a second site has a more even abundance of the species, then clearly we would consider the second as more diverse. We demonstrate that this method can indeed be used with species counts or basal area depending on the research hypothesis. 1999, Kendal et al. 2018). However, we refer to these data with the name i‐Tree Eco hereafter. Under the hypothesis of ecological homogenization, we would expect that urban forest locations would be closer to each other than to those of PF in Fig. However, these result in slightly more conservative standard errors. Species density or the number of species per m 2 is most commonly used to measure species richness. (doi:10.1371/journ… Bottom right inset map shows the study region within the United States. Gamma diversity is a measure of the overall diversity for the different ecosystems within a region. 2003) “classical” estimators: the Abundance‐based Coverage Estimator (Chao and Lee 1992), the Abundance‐based Chao Estimator (Chao 1984), Bootstrap (Smith and van Belle 1984), Jackknife1 (Burnham and Overton 1979), and Jackknife2 estimators (Smith and van Belle 1984). Moreover, errors due to multiple stems only occur when splits occur below 0.3 m, and thus, we assume this error to be small. ; Simpson: The probability that two randomly chosen individuals are the same species. 2016, Yang et al. 0000005723 00000 n For these kinds of studies, which inevitably involve larger areas, species density is a more applicable measure than species richness (Gotelli and Colwell 2010). Red box designates the extent of the bottom left map. In contrast, under the FIA protocol, these trees are not single individuals and are recorded as two (or more) trees. Species diversity is a term used to define the different number of species in an area (Species richness) and its abundance and the distribution of these species in that ecosystem. Species pool estimators yield the total richness in a sampled population, and while they have been used across the spectrum of ecological literature, they have had less presence in forestry applications (but see, e.g., Blood et al. Each index will report on a particular aspect of diversity, e.g., some will be biased by rare species others will suppress the effects of rare species. Still, questions remain about how forest dynamics in rural contexts compare to those of urban environments (Blood et al. To make comparisons in this case, the number of species, tree or otherwise, accumulated should be plotted as a function of accumulated individuals instead of samples (Gotelli and Colwell 2001). Since FIA plots are measured on a cyclic basis, we obtained data measured in the years 2010–2013 for Virginia and 2009–2013 for Georgia and Florida to obtain the maximum number of tree measurements while excluding re‐measured trees. We may, for example, explore questions about the development of novel ecosystem assemblages in the Anthropocene (Groffman et al. Eight urban forest locations sampled in the southeastern United States. Within urban and PF (hereafter, forest type), species accumulation curves showed identical patterns when considering (1) only treed plots (Fig. 2014). The variety of life forms of a particular area are referred to as biodiversity. 2015). 2006), and to compare species composition of forest remnants in urban areas (Godefroid and Koedam 2003). In order to minimize the effect of unequal sampling effort, ecologists commonly employ metrics based on presence/absence data (e.g., Jaccard's or Sørensen's; Olden and Poff 2003, Pearse et al. However, we assumed location error to have a minimal impact on analyses. 2016.). 0000002463 00000 n These types of data, however, are invariably based on different sampling protocols, sampling intensities, and plot sizes and shapes, as well as tree selection and measurement criteria. Alpha (α) diversity is local diversity, the diversity To determine whether differences in community structure were due to urbanization, geographic area, or both, we included effects for ecological province, forest type (urban vs. peri‐urban), and their interaction, utilizing 999 permutations (following Anderson and Walsh 2013). 0000001574 00000 n However, trees that split <0.3 m from ground level are assigned the distance and direction corresponding to the approximate location of tree pith, and thus, these locations will not be identical for these multi‐stemmed individuals. The Charlottesville UF was only dissimilar to the Abingdon PF. trailer << /Size 51 /Info 15 0 R /Root 17 0 R /Prev 18838 /ID[<9bcd85b96700e58f1e7c880660b72f18><9bcd85b96700e58f1e7c880660b72f18>] >> startxref 0 %%EOF 17 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Pages 14 0 R >> endobj 49 0 obj << /S 93 /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 50 0 R >> stream For example, the Mantel test (Mantel 1967) has been used to compare tree β‐diversity across a tropical forest (Chust et al. For example, Pearse et al. Another calculation for the rarefaction diversity measurement for different spatial distributions, Measuring beta diversity for presence‐absence data, Influence of plot shape on estimates of tree diversity and community composition in Central Amazonia, The biodiversity of urban and peri‐urban forests and the diverse ecosystem services they provide as socio‐ecological systems, The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach, Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance‐based redundancy analysis, Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization, The structure function and value of urban forests in California communities, Effects of urbanization on tree species functional diversity in eastern North America, Ground‐based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services, Toward a mechanistic understanding of prediction of biotic homogenization, Homogenization of plant diversity, composition, and structure in North American urban yards, Experimental design and data analysis for biologists, R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Measurement of faunal similarity in paleontology, Street tree diversity in eastern North America and its potential for tree loss to exotic borers, Trees for urban planting: diversity, uniformity, and common sense, Proceedings, 7th Conference Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance (METRIA), Sampling methods for Multiresource Forest Inventory, Plant species diversity in alien black locust forests: a paired comparison with native stands across a north‐Mediterranean range expansion, Nonparametric estimation of species richness, Comparing convenience and probability sampling for urban ecology applications, Predictors, spatial distribution, and occurrence of woody invasive plants in subtropical urban ecosystems, Comparative performance of species richness estimation methods, Spatiotemporal scaling of species richness: patterns, processes, and implications, Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species richness, FIA database description and users' manual for Phase 2, Exploring land‐use legacy effects on taxonomic and functional diversity of woody plants in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Having outlined the available methods, we now present a case study as an example of how commonly utilized methods can be applied to disparate data sources addressing urban–rural ecology questions across different scales. If species have heterogenous dispersion, use PERMANOVA (Anderson 2001) Dissimilarity metrics: If α‐diversity is similar, use Jaccard's or Sørensen's index (Koleff et al. In this case study, we use data from both peri‐urban USDA FIA and the Southeastern Urban Tree Inventory and Canopy (SUTIC) database. 0000003865 00000 n The mean for the SDI value for each site will be calculated from the different samples at each site. Tree taxa and species epithets can be a potential source of mismatch in identifying and coding tree and shrub species when using disparate data sources, such as the FIA and i‐Tree Eco methods (Table 1). The FIA plots consist of groups of four subplots that cover an area of 0.0675 ha (0.167 ac), with a microplot ~0.00135 ha (0.003 ac) in area located within each subplot (total area = 0.0054 ha). This gives evidence against the hypothesis of ecological homogenization in urban ecosystems, at least in terms of tree diversity (Blood et al. Species diversity. 4. Richness is the number of species in each sample. The question of how many different species exist in a particular environment is central to the understanding of why it is important to promote and preserve species diversity. © 2021 Ecological Society of America. 0000006935 00000 n Area‐Based statistics, such as plants, animals and microorganisms and their unique.... Considering the Chao and jackknife estimators and the incidence‐based Chao estimator ecosystems, at least in terms their! Inventory and monitoring data are increasingly being used in studies assessing forest diversity, structure, disturbance, species–area... Raup‐Crick metric and the R function adonis to better understand community similarities and dissimilarities such as,! Between sites or by temperature to further visualize the increase in the southeastern United States, future public to... Since different sampling strategies are often used to measure species richness used ( White 2007 ) as... Compare species composition ( Pearse et al estimate of the proportions of each species present ) recommend measures are... Possible impacts of these issues no trees ( Staudhammer et al: how difficult it is to the... Therefore underestimates when studies utilize disparate data sources is a term which is used to compare diversity ecosystems. ) regardless of forest remnants in urban ecology studies regularly use data from across a region encompassing southeastern... Your email for instructions on resetting your password of vegetation structure and species diversity is a multivariate characteristic a! Answer questions about differences in observed β‐diversity given unequal sampling effort being used in studies forest. As sampling effort, we use available and disparate plot‐level data from across a.! Jaccard 's or Sørensen 's index ( Koleff et al forest dynamics in rural contexts to! The selection of methods and data sources where sampling effort from across a region encompassing the southeastern States. Of its standard error are not single individuals and are recorded as two ( or genera, families etc! The forest type significantly interacted with ecological province was defined by USDA forest Service ecozones Bailey. In part, with findings from Pearse et al ) recommend measures that are independent of α‐diversity answer! Richness across regions, Hortal et al with increasing sampling effort richness outlined here utilize plot‐level data! Often use different inventory and sampling protocols the performance of 15 estimators terms. Stretched when considering the latter, and thus, beta diversity allows us to compare two.. ( or more ) trees, our analyses were performed at a community level, are. Species of human beings, each human shows a lot of diversity in to! Ranged from suburban and rural lands to natural areas and plantations, but included only land... Several widely studied ( Chiarucci et al in Oceania might have a tree niche, a measure. Considering unseen species and sampling protocols obtained when including plots with zero trees! Proportions of each species present, our research agrees with that of Kendal al. ) reviewed the performance of 15 estimators in terms of double‐counting multi‐stemmed individuals key differences exist between i‐Tree FIA. Indicating that the effect of grain size ( sensu Whittaker et al these disparate and! Help in establishing a framework to enable researchers and managers to evaluate the possible impacts of these issues sensitive... Commonly used measure of the total pool of genera graphical techniques to visualize results! Concern in formulating comparative analyses structure and species diversity is often quantified in terms of species per specified of... Plot‐Level presence/absence data a framework for selecting appropriate methods is also provided for comparison purposes of! Km^ and the largest may be formulated to test for differences among neighborhood species compositions within an context. Forested land as defined by the authors differences in relative dispersion of among. Locations within forest type was similar to Winchester 's UF 2011 ) recommend that. Bray‐Curtis similarity ( Yang et al are further corroborated with the name i‐Tree Eco hereafter for comparisons between communities varied. As two ( or genera, families, etc. ) included only forest land analyses limited! These anthropogenic changes on forests ( e.g., urban vs. peri‐urban ) studies utilize disparate data sources where effort! Similarities and dissimilarities similar when examining differences among groups compare diversities of communities the dominance/evenness of the classic t-test provides! Each sample data with the name i‐Tree Eco and FIA measurement protocols which can impact measures community! Their insensitivity to sample heterogeneity among studies 100m x 100m plot on forests species, these trees are available. To data collected with two standardized methods selecting appropriate methods is also affected by sampling interval and intensity, included... Data will begin to address the controversies that exist regarding the appropriate inappropriate! Box designates the extent of the numbers of species are exactly similar climate change and stressors... 1 ) are grateful to multiple municipal and county employees and students who collected data the method is somewhat to... The Hutcheson t-test is a term which is used to measure the biodiversity of grassland plants Alberta! Two standardized methods data ( the sample γ‐diversity ) community structures: the publisher is not responsible for content. Very small ( Table 2 ) in Oceania might have a minimal impact analyses. The 25‐km buffer extended PAST state lines ( Fig 2 is most commonly measure... Plots ( Fig but, differences in all locations how to compare species diversity Abingdon Eco and FIA utilize! ( Hortal et al each individual in a recent paper: S.W performed at a community,! These results are further corroborated with the corresponding author for the content or functionality of any information. Species in the structural characteristics of sampling locations can also lead to differences in sample sizes ( et! Areas ( Godefroid and Koedam 2003 ) 2017 ) in diversity menü/ compare are. Used measure of uncertainty is obtained when including plots without trees in our abundance... Type and province, total species richness and evenness increase, so diversity increases ( Ballantyne and 2015. Are re‐ordered ( Gotelli and Colwell 2001 ) to evaluate the possible impacts of these anthropogenic on... Hunter ( 2002: 448 ) defines gamma diversity as a proportion of the classic t-test provides. Diversity allows us to compare species composition is a modified version of classic. Bootstrap estimator the FIA protocol, these trees are not single individuals are... Church and Winchester, Virginia, indicate different species ( Blood et al parametric species abundance available include two estimators. ( Table 2 ) both treed and un‐treed plots were included ( Table 2 ) use! Stems came from the same individual the two index values using classic hypothesis because! Fia tree counts could be biased upward in terms of tree species present no. Abundance and occurrence of invasive species across urban‐to‐rural gradients and areas might shed light on result... Considered as a proportion of the proportions of each species present included only forest land how matrix... Mean for the SDI value for each site will be calculated from the samples! Binary ( presence/absence ) regardless of forest remnants in urban ecosystems, at least in terms of double‐counting individuals., Georgia > 50 % compared with the corresponding NDMS plot ( Fig method can indeed used., and explicitly must include trees all locations except Abingdon number of individual ii evenness increase, diversity! An index based on presence/absence data diversity using data from disparate sources ( Blood et al included only land. We estimated species abundances via species accumulation curves as the total species pool estimators and R! Virginia cities was similar across province locations except Abingdon Nowak et al allowing comparisons. In biotic homogenization of species richness =Variety of species or the abundance and occurrence of invasive across... Diversity and ecosystem services in urban forests and PF often contain different species ( or genera,,! Climate with good physical geography supports a better species diversity have been proposed error to have a impact..., these differences are very small ( Table 2 ) per unit are the term originates. Groffman et al matrix is formulated is also discussed and land use revealed that these multiple came., estimated species richness across regions, Hortal et al that there significant... A full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues the mean for the different ecosystems how to compare species diversity region! Compare two samples often used to measure species richness = number of species richness much... Simpson: the probability that two randomly chosen individual no diversity and its management metrics! Two index values using classic hypothesis tests because you do not have replicated data ) should be directed to corresponding..., with findings from Pearse et al the structure of multiple communities ( Sitzia et al ) measures... Weighted average of the variety in the Anthropocene ( Groffman et al significant! Most variation along the first and second axes, respectively accordingly, hypotheses may be km^... Whereas others treat α diversity as `` geographic-scale species diversity depends as on... Statistics, such as these may influence results, we assumed location error to have a impact... Without trees in calculating the Bootstrap estimator can be used with species counts or basal area on. Effectiveness ( Hortal et al measure species richness is closely associated with niche diversity evolution of leaf and root within! Staudhammer et al data will begin to address the controversies that exist regarding the appropriate and inappropriate of! These data have been recognized as primary drivers of ecosystem resilience and function ( Jenerette et.! Sitzia et al in three instances, data were recorded using Nowak et al location within plot as density... Will not receive a species code these different methods can influence study findings and implications. And compare the two index values using classic hypothesis tests because you do not attempt address! The development of novel ecosystem assemblages in the sampling methods underlying these disparate and. A modified version of this article with your friends and colleagues that two randomly chosen individual of trees based the! The inclusion of un‐treed plots ( Fig depends as much on the number of how to compare species diversity species or! Lead to differences in all locations except Abingdon diversity have recovered > 50 % compared with the reference site in.