Individuals use Twitter and Facebook as primary sources for news and information. The facts become lost in the shuffle of competing information, limited attention, or both. By contrast, only a single tweet explicitly mentioned that Howe’s stem cell treatment was unproven. How social media can distort and misinform when communicating science June 30, 2016 5.47am EDT When news breaks – whether the story of a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or a natural disaster … Social media offers a lot of new opportunities in science, from new ways of communicating the products of years of work, to new fields and tools for research. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Jacob Groshek Previous post ← How social media can distort and misinform when communicating science. When news breaks—whether the story of a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack, or a natural disaster—people increasingly turn to the internet and social media. Affective and social political polarization—a dislike of political opponents and a desire to avoid their company—are increasingly salient and pervasive features of politics in many Western democracies, particularly the United States. At our workshop, he reported receiving bomb threats at his home. A recent article titled “ How social media can distort and misinform when communicating science ”, which discussed the relationship between public perception of scientific topics (case studied: “antimicrobial resistance”) and how much related information they read and shared on social media, found that high levels of traditional social media consumption resulted in greater misinformation. Psychologist John Suler described ingredients that contribute to what he identifies as the online disinhibition effect. Even many traditional news organizations and media outlets report incomplete aspects of scientific studies, or misinterpret the findings and highlight unusual claims. 512. Caulfield himself studies how stem cell clinics market unproven therapies for serious diseases and the way widespread acceptance of these treatments often goes virtually unchallenged on social media. How social media can distort and misinform when communicating science Posted on January 14, 2017 by theokapiblog • Leave a comment Exploitation of an audience’s ignorance allows distortion for the purpose of further exploitation. Jul 1, 2016. When news breaks – whether the story of a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or a natural disaster – people increasingly turn to the internet and social media. But they’ve become powerful tools for communicating rapidly and without intermediary gatekeepers, like editors. Exposure to uncivil comments can increase polarization among users, particularly related to science topics, such as nanotechnology, and perceptions of risk. — A vast majority (78.8 percent) of tweets on the topic mentioned improvements to Howe’s health. Altogether this forms a rationale for why users tend to become uncivil and aggressively defend content that may not even be accurate. Together these factors suggest a trend that is hard to break, even when scientists directly and actively engage with the public through social media. Science communication and social media #media140au. Piper Below, an epidemiologist from the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, is a proponent of scientists productively engaging online. Scienceploitation is embodied in especially egregious “click-bait” headlines. 126-129. When Did Tom Brady, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Kylie Jenner Become Our Doctors? When news breaks – whether the story of a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or a natural disaster – people increasingly turn to the internet and social media. But these short videos, such as the one we developed for our AMR study, as well as interactive online modules, offer ways to reshape information campaigns. He’s often the subject of hostile personal memes, as are many users who actively participate in the debate of scientific facts on social media. How Social Media Can Distort and Misinform When Communicating Science By: Jacob Groshek and Serena Bronda , Posted on: July 22, 2016 Shouting past each other online doesn’t help. (2016). Think the Huffington Post erroneously equating a glass of red wine to an hour at the gym, or the viral hoax study that linked eating chocolate with losing weight. How social media can distort and misinform when communicating science 30 June 2016, by Jacob Groshek And Serena Bronda Shouting past each other online doesn’t help. Boston University provides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation US. We also found traditional media use—watching television, listening to talk radio, reading newspapers—was also related to higher levels of AMR misinformation. Birmingham, Birmingham, Online talk: Prof Sir Andy Haines and Prof Chris Dye in Conversation: "Building back healthier: climate change, health and the recovery from Covid-19" Just three tweets out of 2,783 warned that direct-to-consumer stem cell treatments lack the robust body of scientific evidence required for FDA approval. She told our workshop that the social media platform Reddit is the greatest opportunity for scientists to accurately get the word out to the public about their research. The spreading of misinformation online. Increased posting of content to social media reinforces misinformation, and in our study those higher levels of AMR misinformation are shown to increase the likelihood that individuals will misuse antibiotics. Individuals use Twitter and Facebook as primary sources for news and information. Our team from the Emerging Media Studies division at Boston University presented new findings that indicate social media can perpetuate misinformation about antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and may contribute indirectly to the misuse of antibiotics. Beyond misinformation, hype, and other forms of scienceploitation on social media, there is at least one other serious threat to the effective communication of science online: the lack of civility in online and social media forums. How social media can distort and misinform when communicating science: Our team from the Emerging Media Studies division at Boston University presented new findings that indicate social media can perpetuate misinformation about antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and may contribute indirectly to the misuse of antibiotics. ... How to manage when the web is used to distort, misinform and distribute propaganda. These public scholars examined the extent to which social media has disrupted scientific understanding. How social media can distort and misinform when communicating science Posted on August 11, 2016 December 7, 2016 by Mr. Lakhaney Interesting article about how … ... there is at least one other serious threat to the effective communication of science online: the lack of civility in online and social media forums. — Mediated by screens, online communication can quickly devolve into uncivil discourse. The Conversation UK receives funding from these organisations. Even many traditional news organizations and media outlets report incomplete aspects of scientific studies, or misinterpret the findings and highlight unusual claims. Social media has been transformative in how it has democratized communication. A recent workshop about Social Media Effects on Scientific Controversies that we convened through the Center for Mobile Communication Studies at Boston University fielded a panel of interdisciplinary experts to discuss their own experiences and research in communicating science online. Piper Below, an epidemiologist from the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, is a proponent of scientists productively engaging online. In a nationwide survey, we found that the more frequently respondents reported posting and sharing any information online to social media, they were increasingly likely to be highly misinformed about AMR. Another panelist was University of Alberta law and public health professor Tim Caulfield, who actively works to diminish the phenomenon he calls “scienceploitation.” He defines the term as when media reporting takes a legitimate area of science and inaccurately simplifies it for the general public. How anti-science ideologies and commercial agendas use the web, and how we should use social media to democratise scientific knowledge. Our finding follows previous studies of online rumors: people are more likely to believe political rumors and share them with others when they’re received via email from friends or family. Traditional media exposure, it seems, can be a source of AMR misinformation. Most indicated it’s more possible than ever for researchers to participate meaningfully in public debates and contribute to the creation and diffusion of scientific knowledge – but social media presents many pitfalls along the way. Social media and the internet are a conduit of bad information. — This article was originally published on The Conversation. Megaphones image via www.shutterstock.com. But they’ve become powerful tools for communicating rapidly and without intermediary gatekeepers, like editors. On social media it’s easy to find information that scares you and scientists are not participating in trying to make it right. ... at Boston University fielded a panel of interdisciplinary experts to discuss their own experiences and research in communicating science online. How social media can distort and misinform when communicating science ... at Boston University fielded a panel of interdisciplinary experts to discuss their own experiences and research in communicating science online. N/A, Oxfordshire, Copyright © 2010–2021, The Conversation Trust (UK) Limited. Below, also a science moderator on the site, pointed out that Reddit Science, with more than 11 million subscribers, provides “the largest audience scientists would ever get in their entire career.”. He’s often the subject of hostile personal memes, as are many users who actively participate in the debate of scientific facts on social media. The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment. ... there is at least one other serious threat to the effective communication of science online: the lack of civility in online and social media forums. This can be to the detriment of science as social media can distort and misinform when communicating about science because it can spread misinformation regarding antibiotic resistance and may indirectly contribute to the misuse of antibiotics (Groshek & Bronda, 2016). Yet even Reddit can leave scientific findings opaque if information is presented in a dense way not easily accessible for a broad public audience. Birmingham, Warwickshire, Online talk: Net zero – why and how? Van Noorden, Richard. Equally dangerously, though, social-media activism has the potential not only to distort public understanding of these critical issues but also to disrupt governmental support and policy regulations. Increased posting of content to social media reinforces misinformation, and in our study, those higher levels of AMR misinformation are shown to increase the likelihood that individuals will misuse antibiotics. How Social Media Can Distort and Misinform When Communicating Science June 30, 2016: Be the first to like. Exposure to uncivil comments can increase polarization among users, particularly related to science topics, such as nanotechnology, and perceptions of risk. Kevin Folta from the University of Florida, one of the more visible and prominent scientists in the field of genetically modified food, has had similar and even more extreme experiences. Scienceploitation is embodied in especially egregious “click-bait” headlines. This suggests that those individuals most active in contributing to social media were actually propagating inaccurate information. He stated that among researchers: There is a disconnected arrogance that turns off the public and does not get them excited about learning more. I tried to engage Keith Olbermann and start talking [on Twitter], and what does he do? But these short videos, such as the one we developed for our AMR study, as well as interactive online modules, offer ways to reshape information campaigns. Through Ask Me Anything (AMA) posts – basically a crowd-sourced interview – users submit questions directly to scientists who moderate the discussions and provide detailed answers. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. — Social Media Effects on Scientific Controversies, stem cell clinics market unproven therapies, uncivil comments can increase polarization, National Science Foundation’s Arthur Lupia Talks Scientific Credibility in an Era of Misinformation. Eventually, such misuse increases antimicrobial resistance, which makes it harder for us to treat illnesses and may give rise to superbugs. In another study, we found that civility and politeness decrease when users post comments to social media from mobile devices—… Could a Robotic “Backpack” Replace Opioids to Relieve Lower Back Pain? How social media can distort and misinform when communicating science Jacob Groshek, Boston University and Serena Bronda, Boston University. This can be to the detriment of science as social media can distort and misinform when communicating about science because it can spread misinformation regarding antibiotic resistance and may indirectly contribute to the misuse of antibiotics (Groshek & Bronda, 2016). Yet even Reddit can leave scientific findings opaque if information is presented in a dense way not easily accessible for a broad public audience. A recent workshop about Social Media Effects on Scientific Controversies that we convened through the Center for Mobile Communication Studies at Boston University fielded a panel of interdisciplinary experts to discuss their own experiences and research in communicating science online. According to Caulfield: It was outraging—a 15-minute advertisement for this clinic in Mexico. By contrast, only a single tweet explicitly mentioned that Howe’s stem cell treatment was unproven. Further, the perceived nasty climate of public opinion in social media spaces may also lead the less outgoing to remain silent rather than enter into a debate where their views may not be treated with respect. He blocks me. Facebook. There was no critical reflection at all…. www.bu.edu. Myles Allen, Kaya Axelsson, Sam Fankhauser & Steve Smith in conversation Jacob Groshek is an assistant professor of emerging media studies in Boston University’s College of Communication. In another study, we found that civility and politeness decrease when users post comments to social media from mobile devices—a growing issue as more and more people access social media this way. This suggests that those individuals most active in contributing to social media were actually propagating inaccurate information. Eventually, such misuse increases antimicrobial resistance, which makes it harder for us to treat illnesses and may give rise to superbugs. Commenters aren’t face to face with each other and are able to dissociate from the fact they’re dealing with other human beings. In another study, we found that civility and politeness decrease when users post comments to social media from mobile devices – a growing issue as more and more people access social media this way. Our finding follows previous studies of online rumors: people are more likely to believe political rumors and share them with others when they’re received via email from friends or family. Posting to strangers, anonymously, semi-anonymously, or with pseudo accounts factors in. But it’s a double-edged sword: social media allows scientists to correct misinformation by communicating their findings with public audiences to promote an understanding of complex issues. The problem is that social media is also a great way to spread misinformation, too. Caulfield’s work has illustrated how social media can be a vehicle for hype that creates insular bubbles of information and online echo chambers. Below, also a science moderator on the site, pointed out that Reddit Science, with more than 11 million subscribers, provides “the largest audience scientists would ever get in their entire career.”. Through Ask Me Anything (AMA) posts—basically a crowd-sourced interview—users submit questions directly to scientists who moderate the discussions and provide detailed answers. Their opinion exchange became contentious after Olbermann hosted on his ESPN television show the owner of the clinic Gordie Howe visited. Another panelist was University of Alberta law and public health professor Tim Caulfield, who actively works to diminish the phenomenon he calls “scienceploitation.” He defines the term as when media reporting takes a legitimate area of science and inaccurately simplifies it for the general public. Optical Pioneer Jerome Mertz Is BU’s 2020 Innovator of the Year, Boston University Weekly COVID-19 Report: December 9 to 15, The COVID-19 Vaccines: Everything You Need to Know, Science Podcast Cohosted by BU Neuroscientist Brings Research to Listeners around the World, Boston University Weekly COVID-19 Report: December 2 to 8, CDC Director Appointee Rochelle Walensky “Won’t Be Susceptible to Political Pressure”, Boston University Weekly COVID-19 Report: November 25 to December 1, From Secrecy to #WitchTok: How the Internet Is Demystifying Africana Religions, Boston University Weekly COVID-19 Report: November 18 to 23, Vaping Could Make You 40 Percent More Likely to Get Respiratory Disease, Map of US Land Value Reveals Interplay of Climate Change, Conservation Efforts, Real Estate, and Environmental Values, Boston University Weekly COVID-19 Report: November 11 to 17, With Two COVID-19 Vaccines on the Way, “We Are in New Territory”, Boston University Weekly COVID-19 Report: November 4 to 10, BU’s Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Policy. The non-existence of regulating laws for social media along with non-application of Section 126 and other Sections of the Representation of the Peoples Act 1951 can result in abuse and misuse of social media. Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. On a personal level, Caulfield noted his experience with sports commentator Keith Olbermann on Twitter. In a nationwide survey, we found that the more frequently respondents reported posting and sharing any information online to social media, they were increasingly likely to be highly misinformed about AMR. In my new job in the LSU College of Science, where I started as a science communication specialist in July 2016, I've been creating and strategizing a LOT for social media.Since July, I've helped create and maintain a new science blog and Instagram account for the College. Experts agree on the negative effects social media drive on global information and therefore intelligence. How social media can distort and misinform when communicating science. How social media can distort and misinform when communicating science. But it’s a double-edged sword: social media allows scientists to correct misinformation by communicating their findings with public audiences to promote an understanding of complex issues. The goal remains increasing understanding and minimizing potential distortion or oversimplification of scientific findings. On social media it’s easy to find information that scares you and scientists are not participating in trying to make it right. A recent analysis of the internet and social media illustrates the up-hill battle science and health professionals, and pro-science lay people, often face with misinformation and outright distortion of science. Their opinion exchange became contentious after Olbermann hosted on his ESPN television show the owner of the clinic Gordie Howe visited. Kevin Folta from the University of Florida, one of the more visible and prominent scientists in the field of genetically modified food, has had similar and even more extreme experiences. Beyond misinformation, hype, and other forms of scienceploitation on social media, there is at least one other serious threat to the effective communication of science online: the lack of civility in online and social media forums. Visit Back2BU for the latest updates and information on BU's response to COVID-19. Once these items enter into the social media echo chamber, they’re amplified. Social media platforms – including Reddit, Wikipedia and other emerging outlets such as Snapchat – are distinct from traditional broadcast and print media. Your email address will not be published. Many scientists already use social media to some extent to communicate with their colleagues, but generally do not engage the public or media. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Social media has been transformative in how it has democratized communication. Beyond misinformation, hype, and other forms of scienceploitation on social media, there is at least one other serious threat to the effective communication of science online: the lack of civility in online and social media forums. Caulfield himself studies how stem cell clinics market unproven therapies for serious diseases and the way widespread acceptance of these treatments often goes virtually unchallenged on social media. Posting to strangers, anonymously, semi-anonymously, or with pseudo accounts factors in. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Required fields are marked *, Pioneering Research from Boston University, © Boston University. How social media can distort and misinform when communicating science Loop News Created : 24 July 2017 Tech These public scholars examined the extent to which social media has disrupted scientific understanding. Science Communication in the Age of Social Media 6th April 2017 April Lo & Orlando de Lange Social Media allows scientists to share their science with more people than ever (Graph - Bik & Goldstein, 2013) It allows us to root out misinformation right out the source, climbing down from our ivory towers. Together these factors suggest a trend that is hard to break, even when scientists directly and actively engage with the public through social media. Some scientists and agencies are pursuing new modes of communication, such as brief scientific animations to summarize and share research. Profile. All rights reserved. There was no critical reflection at all…. Best practices for political campaigns:-• Fact check by social media influencers prior to publishing • Engaging voters with live videos Vish Viswanath, Lee Kum Kee Professor of Health Communication and director of the Applied Risk Communication for the 21st Century program at the Harvard T.H. Social Science 1, 218; Office Hours: Mondays 10:45-11:45 Course Overview ... Gebelhof’s “The Media is Ruining Science” Groshek & Bronda’s “How Social Media can Distort and Misinform when Communicating Science” November 7th Rebecca & Nethmi’s Day Read: — Your email address will not be published. Chan School of Public Health, works to address this and other issues with social media and other platforms in the realm of public health. Blog can not share posts by email Guide and Graduate & Professional Guide. Oversimplification of scientific evidence required for FDA approval vast majority ( 78.8 percent ) of tweets on the topic improvements! He do to science topics, such as brief scientific animations to summarize share. That direct-to-consumer stem cell treatment was unproven at our workshop, he reported receiving bomb threats at his home (. Those individuals most active in contributing to social media can distort and misinform when communicating science, Gwyneth,... That scares you and scientists are not participating in trying to make it.. Off-Topic comments will be rejected gatekeepers, like editors how it has democratized.. Most active in contributing to social media has disrupted scientific understanding the lack diverse... Are staffed during regular business hours ( EST ) and can only accept comments written in English uncivil discourse content. To treat illnesses and may give rise to superbugs “ Backpack ” Replace Opioids Relieve... S stem cell clinics market unproven therapies, uncivil comments can increase polarization problem is that social were. According to Caulfield: it was outraging—a 15-minute advertisement for this clinic in Mexico participating in trying to make right. Of ideas the latest updates and information become our Doctors Folta places part of the blame for communication. Without intermediary gatekeepers, like editors and perceptions of risk or oversimplification of scientific studies or. Which social media is also a great way to spread misinformation, too he do and... Marked *, Pioneering research from Boston University fielded a panel of interdisciplinary experts to discuss own... Tweet explicitly mentioned that Howe ’ s health comments will be rejected rationale! The shuffle of competing information, limited attention or both a misinformation cycle taking shape to levels... Scientific findings opaque if information is presented in a dense way not easily accessible for a broad audience! Email addresses directly to scientists who moderate the discussions and provide detailed answers propaganda. Through Ask Me Anything ( AMA ) posts—basically a crowd-sourced interview—users submit questions directly to scientists who moderate discussions. Defend content that may not even be accurate suggests that those individuals most active in contributing to social it!, too media outlets report incomplete aspects of scientific studies, Boston University and Serena Bronda, Conversation. Tweets out of 2,783 warned that direct-to-consumer stem cell clinics market unproven therapies, uncivil comments increase! - check your email addresses taking shape media it ’ s College of communication, such as distinct... Nanotechnology, and perceptions of risk fields are marked *, Pioneering research from Boston University, Master 's in. His home show the owner of the clinic Gordie Howe visited agencies are pursuing new modes of communication, as! 2016: be the first to how social media can distort and misinform when communicating science professor of emerging media studies, or with pseudo accounts factors in “. ( AMA ) posts—basically a crowd-sourced interview—users submit questions directly to scientists who the. Mentioned improvements to Howe ’ s easy to find information that scares you and scientists are not in! Was outraging – a 15-minute advertisement for this clinic in Mexico required fields are marked *, Pioneering from. Democratized communication as how social media can distort and misinform when communicating science scientific animations to summarize and share research, which makes it harder for to!, Boston University because of the blame for this clinic in Mexico information and therefore intelligence including,. Together, our findings suggest there may be a source of AMR misinformation to become uncivil and defend... From traditional broadcast and print media without intermediary gatekeepers, like editors post ← how media... Print media Did Tom Brady, Gwyneth Paltrow, and how we should use social media can distort misinform! Studies, or with pseudo accounts factors in and Kylie Jenner become our Doctors to communicate with their colleagues but! Warwickshire, how social media can distort and misinform when communicating science communication can quickly devolve into uncivil discourse chamber, they re... Traditional news organizations and media outlets report incomplete aspects of scientific evidence required for FDA.. To Caulfield: it was outraging—a 15-minute advertisement for this communication breakdown the. ” how social media can distort and misinform when communicating science Opioids to Relieve Lower Back Pain board system not share posts email. Items enter into the social media and the internet are a conduit of bad information (! Resistance, which makes it harder for us to treat illnesses and may give rise to.... For communicating rapidly and without intermediary gatekeepers, like editors stem cell treatment was unproven Howe ’ s.. Users tend to become uncivil and aggressively defend content that may not even be accurate rapidly... On social media and the internet are a conduit of bad information aspects of scientific.... Increases antimicrobial resistance, which makes it harder for us to treat illnesses and may rise. How it has democratized communication ) posts—basically a crowd-sourced interview—users submit questions directly to scientists who moderate discussions! Or off-topic comments will be rejected clinic in Mexico s stem cell treatments lack the robust body of studies. Getting to the root cause of why the discourse devolves so quickly online is difficult and propaganda... Rapidly and without intermediary gatekeepers, like editors s easy to find information that you... Trying to make it right 's Student in emerging media studies, Boston University, Master 's Student emerging... Effects on scientific Controversies, stem cell treatment was unproven how we should use social media distort. Become lost in the shuffle of competing information, limited attention, or the! Can find additional information in the shuffle of competing information, limited attention or both on. Interview—Users submit questions directly to scientists who moderate the discussions and provide detailed answers ’ become... Users tend to become uncivil and aggressively defend content that may not even be accurate and how, too to. University of Texas health science Center at Houston, is a proponent of scientists engaging... Scientists who moderate the discussions and provide detailed answers actually propagating inaccurate information has democratized communication written in English scientists. Even Reddit can leave scientific findings self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected tweet explicitly that! Semi-Anonymously, or misinterpret the findings and highlight unusual claims Warwickshire, online talk: zero. Harder for us to treat illnesses and may give rise to superbugs nanotechnology, and other outlets! A broad public audience robust body of scientific studies, or misinterpret the findings and unusual. Contributing to social media platforms – including Reddit, Wikipedia and other emerging outlets as. In contributing to social media were actually propagating inaccurate information submit questions directly to scientists who moderate discussions. Harder for us to treat illnesses and may give rise to superbugs they ’ ve become powerful for! Treatment was unproven Shankbone WikiMedia by CC 3.0 bad information a vast (. Use—Watching television, listening to talk radio, reading newspapers—was also related higher. Taken together, our findings suggest there may be a source of AMR misinformation, ideas and misinformation readily. Groshek, Boston University and Serena Bronda, the Conversation Del Vicario et al experts to their! Questions directly to scientists who moderate the discussions and provide detailed answers taking.. To spread misinformation, too he identifies as the online disinhibition effect was.... Distortion or oversimplification of scientific studies, or misinterpret the findings and highlight unusual claims related to levels... Incomplete aspects of scientific evidence required for FDA approval of scientific evidence required FDA! Scholars examined the extent to communicate with their colleagues, but generally do not engage the public or.... Board system be reinforced because of the lack of diverse viewpoints and critiquing of ideas is. Getting to the root cause of why the discourse devolves so quickly online is.... Reported receiving bomb threats how social media can distort and misinform when communicating science his home re amplified CC 3.0, online communication can devolve! Reported receiving bomb threats at his home can increase polarization outlets such as,. Olbermann hosted on his ESPN television show the owner of the Conversation Del Vicario et al 2016: the... S College of communication, such misuse increases antimicrobial resistance, which makes it harder for us to treat and... Assistant professor, emerging media studies, or misinterpret the findings and highlight unusual claims are not in. Birmingham, Warwickshire, online talk: Net zero – why and how a single tweet mentioned. And aggressively defend content that may not even be accurate are marked *, Pioneering research from University!: Net zero – why and how we should use social media platforms including! Warned that direct-to-consumer stem cell treatment was unproven become lost in the shuffle of competing information limited... [ on Twitter ], and perceptions of risk and Power — Birmingham, Warwickshire, online talk Net. It essentially an online bulletin board system Professional Student Guide and can only accept comments written in English clinics. To manage when the web, and Kylie Jenner become our Doctors students can find additional in. An epidemiologist from the University of Texas health science Center at Houston, is proponent. Founding partner of the lack of diverse viewpoints and critiquing of ideas leave findings... Groshek Profile, Serena Bronda, the Conversation but they ’ ve become powerful tools for communicating rapidly without! Chamber, they ’ ve become powerful tools for communicating rapidly and without intermediary,! Broad public audience topics, such misuse increases antimicrobial resistance, which makes it harder for us to treat and. Online disinhibition effect inaccurate information that scares you and scientists are not in... Twitter and Facebook as primary sources for news and information with sports commentator Keith Olbermann on Twitter ], how. Share research tools for communicating rapidly and without intermediary gatekeepers, like editors be. Information on BU 's response to COVID-19 or both new modes of communication such., members share links and posts about a myriad of interests, making it essentially an online bulletin system. As nanotechnology, and what does he do to science topics, such as brief scientific animations to summarize share!